Thursday, 3 October 2019
1. Empaneled Hospitals should not refuse treatment
in emergency cases insisting formalities.
Click here to see the ORDER
2. Revised guidelines for settling the pending medical
Click here to see the ORDER
2. Revised guidelines for settling the pending medical
Extra Increment case came up today which was
numbered at 43.
DOT lawyer was not available. It appeared that he had asked BSNL lawyer to
attend in his absence if the case came up.
Our lawyer left his junior because he had to attend a case in HC. He also
informed Com N K Srinivasan who worked in our department earlier and
now a practicing lawyer to take care of the case for Passover to argue
in the afternoon . Since DOT lawyer was absent , pass over was not possible
and automatically would be adjourned .
When the case came up BSNL lawyer wanted adjournment as the
clarification asked from DOT was not received. Since stay was there, they
were already enjoying and nothing was going to happen. The judges asked
whether there was a stay from Supreme Court ?
NKS told that since there is Ernakulam HC judgement there is no need to
further delay the case.
Both the judges asked BSNL lawyer whether this case is similar to that case
for which that lawyer replied "Yes".
If it's so then what is the problem? Judges asked.
Then Judges gave the directive to both sides as "Petitioners should submit
a memo incorporating the points that the case is similar to the case of
Ernakulam HC case."
Similarly Respondents should submit a memo incorporating the points that
it is dissimilar.
We shall hear the case and decide on 7/11/19 judges pronounced.
But Com NKS tried to advance the date but judges told that there are many
holidays in between and hence not possible to prepone.
Today Com Sukumaran, CHQ VP, Com Kalidasan, our Treasurer and myself
attended the court
RV.
Circle Secretary
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.